top of page
Writer's pictureMario Espinosa

Can Women Be Ordained as Pastors?



The question of whether women can serve as pastors and hold positions of spiritual teaching authority in the church is a deeply debated topic among Christians. At the heart of this discussion are two theological perspectives: Complementarianism and Egalitarianism.

 

Complementarians believe God has ordained distinct roles for men and women, reserving positions of spiritual authority, including the pastorship, exclusively for men. Egalitarians, on the other hand, hold that men and women are equally called to all areas of ministry, including leadership roles within the church. To understand the foundations of these views, we will examine key Bible passages and how they are interpreted within these frameworks.

 

The Scriptures provide guidance that can help us discern God’s will in this matter.  This essay examines key passages to demonstrate why the Complementarian view is the biblical model for church leadership.

 

1 Corinthians 11:1-16: Affirming the Order of Creation

This passage discusses head coverings in worship and the relationships between men, women, and Christ.


In this passage, Paul outlines the roles of men and women in worship, grounding his argument in the created order. He writes, “the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God” (v. 3). This hierarchy reflects God’s design, not just for the family but for the church as well. Complementarians see this as a clear indication that men are called to lead in worship and spiritual teaching roles, while women are called to serve in complementary roles.


Egalitarians, however, focus on verses like v. 11 and 12, which highlight mutual interdependence between men and women. They argue that Paul’s instructions about head coverings were culturally specific to the Corinthians and do not establish a timeless mandate restricting women’s roles in leadership. For Egalitarians, this passage emphasizes unity and equality in Christ rather than hierarchy.


However, the symbolism of head coverings, discussed in the passage, further underscores the created order point. Paul’s appeal to creation, rather than culture, as the basis for these distinctions (v. 8-9) confirms that this order transcends time and cultural context. Egalitarian interpretations, which claim this passage is culturally bound, fail to account for Paul’s theological grounding in creation.


1 Corinthians 14:33-40: Maintaining Order in Worship

In this passage, Paul instructs that women should remain silent in churches, a statement often cited in discussions about women’s roles in ministry. Complementarians view this as a clear directive supporting their stance that women should not assume positions of teaching authority in the church. They see this as part of maintaining the order God designed for worship.


Egalitarians, by contrast, argue that Paul’s instruction addressed specific cultural disruptions in the Corinthian church rather than setting a universal standard. They point to examples of women speaking and leading in other parts of Scripture as evidence that this restriction was situational rather than absolute.


What Egalitarians fail to recognize though is that Paul’s reference to “as in all the churches of the saints” (v. 33) suggests a universal principle rather than a local issue. This consistency reinforces the Complementarian understanding that teaching authority within the gathered church is reserved for men.


Ephesians 5:22-33: Male Leadership as Christ’s Example

In this passage, Paul outlines the roles of husbands and wives, comparing their relationship to that of Christ and the church. He writes, “Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church” (vv. 22-23, ESV). Complementarians see this as affirming male headship in the family and church, drawing a parallel between Christ’s leadership and the husband’s role as the spiritual leader. This perspective supports the belief that pastoral roles are reserved for men.


Egalitarians emphasize verse 21, which calls for mutual submission, as the guiding principle of this passage. They argue that the relationship described is one of partnership rather than hierarchy, and that such mutual submission extends to leadership roles within the church. Yet the subsequent verses (vv. 22-23, ESV) clarify that submission is expressed differently within the God-ordained roles of men and women, which again reinforces the Complementarian view.


1 Timothy 2:8-15: A Direct Prohibition

Paul’s statement in 1 Timothy 2, “I do not permit a woman to teach or to exercise authority over a man” (v. 12), is one of the clearest affirmations of the Complementarian position. This is seen as a timeless prohibition, grounded in the creation order and reinforced by Paul’s reference to Adam and Eve. He grounds this prohibition not in cultural considerations but in the creation order: “For Adam was formed first, then Eve” (v. 13). Additionally, Paul references the fall, highlighting the consequences of Eve’s deception as definitive evidence that God has ordained men to lead and serve as pastors, and in teaching authority within the church.


Egalitarians, however, argue that this instruction was specific to the context of the Ephesian church, which faced issues of false teaching. They highlight that Paul elsewhere praises women like Priscilla, who taught men, as evidence that women are not universally prohibited from teaching or holding authority.


Egalitarian arguments that this passage is doctrinally and culturally specific fail to account for Paul’s appeal to timeless theological truths. This prohibition is not an arbitrary restriction but reflects God’s design for leadership within His church.


Acts 18:18-26: Priscilla’s Role in Context

The account of Priscilla and Aquila teaching Apollos is significant in this discussion because it is often cited by Egalitarians as evidence that women can teach men in a significant theological context. They see this as evidence that God’s calling to teach and lead is not restricted by gender.


However, a closer look supports the Complementarian position. Priscilla’s instruction took place in partnership with her husband, Aquila, and outside the formal setting of the gathered church.


Complementarians argue that this account does not contradict Paul’s prohibition in 1 Timothy 2. Instead, it demonstrates that women can have meaningful roles in ministry while respecting God’s design for male leadership in spiritual authoritative teaching roles.


Romans 16:1: Understanding Phoebe’s Role

Paul commends Phoebe, a deacon in the church at Cenchreae, further fueling the debate and leading some to argue that women held leadership positions in the early church.

Egalitarians point to Phoebe’s role as evidence that women held significant positions in the early church, challenging the idea of male-exclusive leadership. Complementarians interpret the term “deacon” as a servant role distinct from the formal office of deacon, which they argue is reserved for men.


Manuscript Evidence

The term "diakonos" is used in the earliest Greek manuscripts of Romans 16:1, and it literally means "servant" or "helper." The question is whether Phoebe held an official office of "deacon" in the sense of a recognized spiritual leader, as the term "deacon" is often understood today in the church, or whether it simply refers to her role as a servant in the broader sense.


Historical Context

In the early church, the role of "deacon" was not as clearly defined as it later became in church structures. In some contexts, the term "diakonos" was used to describe anyone serving in the church, not necessarily a formal office-holder. Some scholars argue that Phoebe was likely a prominent member of the church in Cenchreae, performing important duties in the church, but it’s debated whether she held an official "office" of deacon as we understand it today.


Biblically speaking, there is no evidence that Phoebe held a position of spiritual authority over men.


Therefore, Complementarians interpret this passage as affirming the valuable contributions of women in the church while maintaining the distinct roles God has ordained.


Conclusion: God’s Design for Church Leadership

While Scripture provides examples of women in prominent roles, the Bible consistently affirms the Complementarian position: God has ordained that men serve as pastors and hold positions of spiritual teaching authority in the church. This is grounded in the creation order, upheld in Paul’s instructions and reinforced by passages such as 1 Timothy chapters 2 and 3, and modeled in the relationship between Christ and the church.


Egalitarians will argue that cultural context, mutual submission, and examples of women in leadership throughout the Bible point to a broader calling for women in ministry. They also see no such restriction for women, believing that the gifts of teaching and leadership are given equally to men and women for the building up of the church.


Ultimately, the interpretation of these passages reflects deeper theological revelations about God’s design for men and women within the church.


While women play indispensable roles in the life of the church, Scripture makes clear distinctions between the roles of men and women. The Complementarian perspective aligns with and honors these distinctions, ensuring that God’s design for His church is respected and upheld. As we submit to His Word, we align ourselves with His perfect plan for leadership and ministry in the body of Christ.

1 view0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page